They use people's real plights for emotional blackmail and manipulation. Sourced, side-by-side, undeniable.
Piers Morgan says that he would gladly trade an Englishman for a weekly Tikka Masala, yet calls someone a “disgusting prick” for daring to say that they would choose their own dog over a Muslim that they don’t know.
Piers Morgan exhibits a double standard regarding dehumanizing statements. In one instance, he says he would 'happily trade' white English people for chicken tikka masala, a statement that devalues a group of people in exchange for a food item. In another post, he calls a politician a 'disgusting pr*ck' for making a statement prioritizing dogs over Muslims. Morgan vociferously condemns another person for making a dehumanizing comment, a standard he himself appears to violate.
The same voices that branded the removal of sexually explicit material from school libraries as fascist book-banning had, two years earlier, cheered the discontinuation of six Dr. Seuss titles over offensive imagery. Either pulling books is censorship or it is not — the principle cannot depend on which books and whose politics.
An illustrative entry of the classic pattern: a concern is dismissed as a debunked conspiracy, only for it to later be acknowledged as true. Replace with real, sourced examples via the admin panel.
They update the rules while claiming nothing changed. Get the receipts first.